Menu ENN Search
Language: English Fran├žais

Post a reply: Why Credibility Interval (CI) is slightly changing while estimating Posterior Coverage by using SQUEAC coverage estimate calculator (Version 3.01)

Use of en-net is subject to the Terms and Conditions.

I used: Alpha: 26.9, Beta: 13 and precision %: 10, From wide area survey, we found 48 SAM children out of which 27 SAM children were in OTP program and 21 SAM children were not in OTP program. SQUEAC Coverage estimate calculator gives the posterior coverage: 61.6% ( CI 50.9%-71.0), 61.6% ( CI 51.0%-70.9%), 61.6% (CI 51.1%.-71.1%) .... My question is: Why different CI though all other parameters are same?
To add a URL link click the chain button within the editor and enter a URL
Please give your real name

Your email will not be displayed on the website

Your question will be manually approved before it appears on the website. We reserve the right to delete any inappropriate messages.