Menu ENN Search
Language: English Fran├žais

Post a reply: New article : MUAC with WHZ or MUAC with WAZ - Which is better?

Use of en-net is subject to the Terms and Conditions.

Here is a new article from the wasting and stunting (WaSt) technical interest group which examines the relationship between anthropometry and near term mortality in children.

There has been some recent articles promoting the the use of WHZ in CMAM programs. These articles have to be taken seriously even if the finding are based on the use of clinical data and likely to be subject to all sorts of selection biases. We used cohort data to look at this (and other) issues. The findings confirm that MUAC only programs do fail to pick up children with high mortality risk and that WUAC + WAZ (not WHZ) is likely to be the best combination of anthropometric indicators to use. This combination (i.e. MUAC and WAZ) will likely be most practical in setting where growth monitoring (GM) or growth monitoring and promotion (GMP) programs are running. Case finding in clinical setting may also prove useful.

Share and enjoy.

Please give your real name

Your email will not be displayed on the website
Optional

Your question will be manually approved before it appears on the website. We reserve the right to delete any inappropriate messages.

Retype the CAPTCHA code from the image
Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code