Menu ENN Search
Language: English Fran├žais

Post a reply: squeac coverage survey results

Use of en-net is subject to the Terms and Conditions.

Hello friends Good afternoon. i have been reviewing a number of coverage survey reports( more than 15) mostly done by NGOs using SQUEAC and have noticed that surveys which calculate the sample size for mimimum cases and also the sample size for villages to visit wide ( at times called small area surveys) are reporting very low coverage results consistenly below 50% ,some even as low as 20% which is unlike earlier CMAM/CTC programmes though many were measured using CSAS.All these are happening at a time when most of the earlier uptake of CMAM services barriers like RUTF stock outs have been addressed due to the presence of many donors like UNICEF,Clinton etc.Are there any other observations out their in the field.
To add a URL link click the chain button within the editor and enter a URL
Please give your real name

Your email will not be displayed on the website

Your question will be manually approved before it appears on the website. We reserve the right to delete any inappropriate messages.