I post this response on behalf of Ms. Savita Malla Advocacy and Communication Specialist National Nutrition and Food Security Secretariat (NNFSS)National Planning Commission (NPC).
An interactive discussion on the issue of Food and Nutrition Security with the Members of Parliament of Nepal was organised in the month of June 2016. This is an extract from the report prepared. For any further details please contact Ms. Savita Malla - on samalla@unicef.org
The National Planning Commission (NPC) organized a one and a half-day interaction programme with the Members of Parliaments (MPs) to sensitize them on the issues of nutrition, food securityand its implications on the overall maternal and child health
(MNCH).Around 60 honourable members from 16 districts, where Multi-sector Nutrition Plan (MSNP) is being implemented,attended the interaction programme.The interaction programme was designed to be both informative as well as stimulating to galvanize the parliamentarians and bureaucrats around the important issues of nutrition and MNCH.A particular key agenda was also to inform and seek commitment from the MPs on the current and proposed nutrition, food security
and MNCH related legal provisions. The meeting was chaired by the Member of the Planning Commission and the Joint Secretary in the Nepal Government and SUN Focal Point. It was well attended by dignitaries from all relevant ministries, UNICEF Nutrition Section and INGOs like ACF who work on Nutrition in Nepal.
Key discussion points were
1. While the MPs expressed their commitment to endorse necessary MNCH and nutrition andfood security related acts, they pointed out that no new acts or bills have been tabled in the parliament for the last two years. They urged the Government of Nepal (GoN), including the bureaucratic machinery, to show urgency in preparing and tabling the relevant acts to theparliaments for their endorsement.
2.While the necessary new laws need to be enacted, effectively implementing existing laws on MNCH and nutrition is equally important. On this, the MPs asked of the factors that hamper effective implementation of existing laws.
3.Sensitizing MPs on MNCH and nutrition not only helps to ensure their legislative commitments but pays further dividend as they can be instrumental in delivering health messages to their constituencies
4. The MPs took the interaction meeting as a good example of interplay among the technocrats and politicians but suggested that such interconnectedness not only be limited to occasional meetings but also be pervasive in day-to-day work.
6. While the MPs agreed on the need to increase budget and funding for nutrition, some questioned why the past investments in nutrition has not produced commensurate results
7. Centralized planning and/or only paying lip service to decentralization was identified as a major factor hampering sustainable and practical solutions to curb malnutrition and improve maternal and child health. Several MPs urged the government planners and development partners to not try to ‘guess’ the problems of the local communities sitting at the centre but design tailor-made solutions that create value at communities
8.Some MPs were of the opinion that while they may be some level of bottom-up planning but the budgetary processes remain largely top-down. Seldom do the central bureaucrats hear the voices and the need of the communities in formulating budgets
9. The MPs expressed their willingness to invest the electoral constituency development funds for improving nutrition and food security.
10.Many opined that most of the budget, resources and programmes on nutrition are mainly flowing in accessible areas creating further disparity and widening the gap between rich and the poor in terms of burden of nutrition
11.While there was a unanimous consensus on the importance of multi sector response in nutrition, some felt the response was still immature with further room for improvement,especially in addressing pertinent questions such as who leads, who is accountable and to whom. This is further compounded by the fact that the National Planning Commission – the current apex body assigned to oversee the MSNP – is a coordinating body and not the implementing one.
Interactions of such kinds with parliamentarians and politicians, on broader MNCH, nutrition and food security issues, can be examples of good practices for others countries to follow.Nepal can share the benefits and mechanics of organizing these types of events in international forums