To further add to this discussion, this issue of donations is the only one where interpretation says a subsequent WHA resolution has superceded the original text of the Code.
There is a two-page summary of the Code and all subsequent relevant resolutions with UNICEF and WHO logos on it, in IBFAN's "Breaking the Rules, Stretching the Rules" reports in 2014 and 2017. Those reports were behind a paywall and subsequently are unavailable so I can't share it here.
The language in this summary is as follows, emphasis is mine.
"Note: Articles 6.6 and 6.7 of the Code have been superseded by WHA 39.28 [1986], WHA 45.34 [1992] & WHA 47.5 [1994]"
IBFAN's Code Essentials series also references this, but again, they are not publicly available:
And as Sarah points out WHA 47.5 is now superseded by 63.23. There is a document in the Save the Children IYCF-E Toolkit from 2017 that summarizes the portions of the Code and the subsequent WHA resolutions relevant to emergencies: https://unicefeapronietoolkit.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/1-summary-code-sections-and-emergencies.pdf
It's a good document, I think, although it could do with an update, since it doesn't include anything on WHA 69.9 (relevant to commercial complementary foods).
I also note it's common for people to refer to the Code or to WHA 47.5 where it says, in reference to BMS donations, that "the supply is continued for as long as the infants concerned need it." (replacing Article 6.7 which says "institution or organization should take steps to ensure that supplies can be continued as long as the infants concerned need them.")
WHA 63.23 does not repeat that language, so if it completely supersedes WHA 47.5, which supersedes Article 6.7, we have lost that language.