Menu ENN Search
Language: English Français

Admission Criteria of Acute Malnutrition

This question was posted the Management of wasting/acute malnutrition forum area and has 8 replies.

» Post a reply

Abdirahim Hussein Jama

national Nutritionist-ICRC

Normal user

20 Jul 2022, 10:06

Someone can help, please: A W/H of the child became between >-3 to <-2 z/score (MAM) at the same time when screened his/her MUAC the child became SAM <115cm, which criteria we can consider (Z-score or MUAC) or which program we can admit to this child OTP or TSFP?

Anonymous 41120

Nutrition Assistant-Save the Children Internationa

Normal user

20 Jul 2022, 12:14

They are all independent admission criteria......I would wonder if the MUAC or WHF Z-score measurement are so correct........but I will suggest you retake the MUAC and or Both measurements. 

Kemal J. Tunne

Health and Nutrition Senior Officer at CRS

Normal user

20 Jul 2022, 12:33

This is clear  MUAC< 11.5  Admissions criteria for OTP

Mustafa Alamin

Emergency Nutrition Technical Advisor_ SCI

Normal user

20 Jul 2022, 12:33


Dear Abdelrahim,

Since the child MUAC measurement is <11.5cm, the case is definitly SAM and is OTP criteria. 



KIAWARA Léonce

Attaché de santé spécialisé en Pédiatrie/INTERSOS

Normal user

20 Jul 2022, 12:38

The admission criteria being independent, it is recommended to consider the MUAC in this specific case to classify the child as a SAM.

As for the management of the child, it will be necessary to find out if his appetite is preserved or if he has medical complications:

- If his appetite is good and he is alert, then he can be treated on an outpatient basis in a health facility (OTP).

- If he does not have a good appetite or has medical complications, he will be treated as an inpatient in a stabilisation centre or facility.

Axel SOMESSI

Nutritionniste

Normal user

20 Jul 2022, 14:36

Dear friend),

Mr. KIAWARA Léonce explained so well that I recommend to you what he gave as an explanation.

Aye Thwin

Normal user

20 Jul 2022, 17:31

Dear Abdirahim

Most guides said you can choose either criteria MUAC or WHZ. However, a lot of studies showed MUAC (<11.5 cm) as better indicator of mortality than WHZ (<-3). That means by using MUAC for admission you can assure to save more lives.

However, the choice should also depend on your case load. If your OTP caseload is still manageable, you may choose the criteria that make more admission. If not, you may choose the another.

It is also important to note that discharge criteria should be the same as the admission criteria.

Angelina Nyibol Akol

Normal user

21 Jul 2022, 13:28

Dear team,

In the standard indicators of SAM case identification the range from Oedema, MUAC and Z-Score, when doing admission you prioritize the first admission criteria which is oedema, in the absence of oedema, the next criteria is MUAC then followed by Z-Score at least the measurement was not done appropriately. 

In this case I will advise you to prioritize MUAC after a confirmation from another technical nutritionist to confirm both the first MUAC and the weight were taken correctly. 

Thanks, 

Anonymous 24

Forum moderator

21 Jul 2022, 14:01

Dear Abdirahim,

It is also important that you consult the national protocol or guidelines for programme admission, discharge and management for the country in which you are working. 

Best wishes,

Tamsin

If you have any problem posting a response, please contact the moderator at post@en-net.org.

Back to top

» Post a reply